You did in fact say that the original languages were misleading me.I make no such claim. Nor am I ifallible as some foolishly c
Learning Greek and Hebrew can be profitable but as long as it is remembered that Hebrew was of no help to Saul of Tarsus or the religionsists who opposed Christ and Hebrew was their mother tounge.
and the snare is that you will lean more upon your understanding of Hebrew or Greek than trust in the lord who will and does lead you into all truth .
As for predestination . It cannot be denied as it si taught in scripture.
The example and means by which a foundational understanding can be obtained by the law of the seed .has not been either proved to be wrong by any here .
I never said a son inherits the sin of his father .I said in effect they inherit the consequences .
Adam was blessed in the garden after he had sinned his sons were born outside the blessing and under the curse.
How can that be disputed?
and if the scripture says by one mans disobedience all men die . How then do you dispute that?
and if by one mans obedience how then do you dispute that?
Thus by one a man inherits corruption and death.
and b y the other he inherits righteousness and eternal life
if you deny the one you cannot have the other .
in Christ
Gerald
As for Saul of Tarsus, here again you're trying to mix very different issues and jumble them all together. This is just ridiculous and I won't waste any more time trying to explain it. Also, for you to state that somehow this is a "snare" that will cause me to "lean more upon your understanding of Hebrew or Greek than trust in the lord" is a denial of scripture's many injunctions for people to study, reason, and search. Education in the original Biblical languages is only feared by those who prefer ignorance.
And since you keep denying what you have clearly said, I will no longer respond to you. Good day.