I see. I do not agree with you. I am not sure many will either. But your thinking is your choice.
With all due respect to you, please know that you are not the 1st to bring up Preterist theology.....IF that is what you are doing.
I asked you that question but you did not answer so I am presumming.
We can go back and forth till Jesus comes on this, but the Preterist position is not valid and can not be defended.
You see, Preterism works backwards from Eschatology to Theology proper, (Pneumatology, Christology, Hamartiology, and Anthropology,) which forces each theology to be constrained.
According to According to preterists…
The Tribulation
The Antichrist
The Abomination of Desolation
Jesus’ Coming (Matthew 24; Revelation 19)
…are all things of the past.
Many preterists believe that these things were fulfilled in the turmoil and political upheaval that ensued when Jerusalem was sacked by Rome and most of its inhabitants were slaughtered in A.D. 70. That seems to be what YOU are saying as well.
Now, preterism is actually very similar to an unbiblical teaching that was making its rounds in the early church.
Paul wrote in
2 Timothy 2:17-18…
“…Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus, men who have gone astray from the truth saying that the resurrection [a future event] has
already taken place, and thus they upset the faith of some.”
Back in the first century, Paul tells us, there were two men, Hymenaeus and Philetus, who were confusing people in the church because they were talking about a
future event as though it
already happened. We might call these two men the first preterists.