Yea its odd how they attack when you expose their errors...It is funny how people attack you Mitspa when you are getting to the truth of things. They say you are personally attacking them to get attention of a moderator so that moderator will shut you up.
You are engaging in the fallacy of "illegitimate totality transfer." Just because a word can have several meanings in differing contexts does not mean that the totality of all those meanings are available in all contexts. ]
I know I am coming in late so I have a lot to read and don't want to repeat what has been said so I will wait to respond about annihilationism but I will respond about the Universalists now so forgive me if I am repeating someone. Now Universalists (which I assume you are not talking about the Universal Kingdom of God Church which I saw in another thread) believe every path leads to God and is good. I have a sister who goes to a Universalist church. She is of the Buddhist mindset and her husband is Catholic. She believes everyone will achieve Nirvana. She finds the gospel enraging because of its narrowness that there is only one way to God. The gospel is the gospel. I do not see how someone can believe all ways to God are good and be a true believer in Christ since the true gospel is that there is only one way to be saved and that is faith in the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. I think it is important to remember that Satan tricks people through niceties and false love which is the great deception in the New Age movement which this church is definitely a part of. Love is what Jesus did for us and can only come from God because real love requires faith since "everything that is not of faith is sin" (Romans 14:23). These false doctrines seem loving because it is hard to comprehend someone in eternal torment, but they are not loving because they give people a false sense of security and love allowing them to be eternally in hell (which I will speak about later if everything is not already covered in the 16 pages).I don't believe all universalists are going to hell and they are the ones known to hold to this doctrine although others do as well, such as seventh day adventists if I recall correctly.
Also the argument that if you dont believe in eternal torment you dont believe in eternal life either is not true. It is true they are the same greek word "aion" for eternal, and some universalists acknowledge this but cite different verses for eternal life. Verses that use a different greek word.
Universalists believe in the same Jesus, they believe that salvation is through Christ's sacrifice alone. I have friends who are universalists and I don't hate them. They are not horrible people. They are not out to deceive the world. They are actually fairly normal people. However universalists believe that everyone is saved through Christ eventually, a view that I feel is a bit misguided.
There is a disturbing trend on online christian forums and chats to go to extremes and say "anyone who doesn't agree with me is hell bound". I think those kind of statements stifle discussion.
So do you see these teachings as related to universalist teachings you have seen in the past...Olivia? Cause I have really been trying to figure out what is really at the root of this stuff?I know I am coming in late so I have a lot to read and don't want to repeat what has been said so I will wait to respond about annihilationism but I will respond about the Universalists now so forgive me if I am repeating someone. Now Universalists (which I assume you are not talking about the Universal Kingdom of God Church which I saw in another thread) believe every path leads to God and is good. I have a sister who goes to a Universalist church. She is of the Buddhist mindset and her husband is Catholic. She believes everyone will achieve Nirvana. She finds the gospel enraging because of its narrowness that there is only one way to God. The gospel is the gospel. I do not see how someone can believe all ways to God are good and be a true believer in Christ since the true gospel is that there is only one way to be saved and that is faith in the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. I think it is important to remember that Satan tricks people through niceties and false love which is the great deception in the New Age movement which this church is definitely a part of. Love is what Jesus did for us and can only come from God because real love requires faith since "everything that is not of faith is sin" (Romans 14:23). These false doctrines seem loving because it is hard to comprehend someone in eternal torment, but they are not loving because they give people a false sense of security and love allowing them to be eternally in hell (which I will speak about later if everything is not already covered in the 16 pages).
Yea its odd how they attack when you expose their errors...
Well don't do that then...Bible verses, that is what am for one, is looking…
Major and MichaelH presented verses to support the counter argument.
Look at your first post # 5 and then the second post # 32…
It seems to me: Proceed to discuss!, then a bunch of verses were given, Ooops, next time?
Then you attack the argument in general?
Bible verses please, an appeal to emotion is a fallacy.
People come to Christ for all different reasons including those who realize there is an eternal hell and need a way out. Watered down beliefs lead to more water downed beliefs. Look at abortion. At one point it was seen as an atrocity. Now it is seen by many as a good thing to do so that the person can have their life devoted to themselves. Those who call themselves Christians who attend a Universalist church would not be able to be accepted by the others if they were so cruel as to believe in everlasting punishment. It would be a complete dichotomy to the belief of acceptance of all ways to God is good and against the love and harmony philosophy that is the basis of the church.So do you see these teachings as related to universalist teachings you have seen in the past...Olivia? Cause I have really been trying to figure out what is really at the root of this stuff?
Well don't do that then...
So do you believe that these folks are from that universalist mindset? And of course man wants to replace his ideas of right and wrong with those of God...that's the product of the tree of knowledge of good and evil...we see that at work in all false doctrine. But Im interested in understanding why this group has appeared on this forum (out of the blue) and has focused only on this issue in this militant manner, as to suppress anyone that rejects these clear and false doctrines?People come to Christ for all different reasons including those who realize there is an eternal hell and need a way out. Watered down beliefs lead to more water downed beliefs. Look at abortion. At one point it was seen as an atrocity. Now it is seen by many as a good thing to do so that the person can have their life devoted to themselves. Those who call themselves Christians who attend a Universalist church would not be able to be accepted by the others if they were so cruel as to believe in everlasting punishment. It would be a complete dichotomy to the belief of acceptance of all ways to God is good and against the love and harmony philosophy that is the basis of the church.
what do you mean? If one rejects the clear reading and intention of scripture, why waste time presenting more scripture ? That's just a silly waste of time You just keep posting and presenting the scripture that defeats their false doctrine until they give up trying to teach the false doctrine...watch I will show you how it works...What do you mean?
A bible study does not ask for a bible verses to support a claim?
I will have to read through the posts since I have 15 more pages to see what has been happening, but I have to get my son breakfast and go somewhere so it might be later.So do you believe that these folks are from that universalist mindset? And of course man wants to replace his ideas of right and wrong with those of God...that's the product of the tree of knowledge of good and evil...we see that at work in all false doctrine. But Im interested in understanding why this group has appeared on this forum (out of the blue) and has focused only on this issue in this militant manner, as to suppress anyone that rejects these clear and false doctrines?
Check it out they are "new" members that came DIRECTLY to this thread, without introduction or in any way concerned about any other topic? I think they are trying to run over anyone who disagrees with them on this issue. They are running some kind of con..and Im curious as to why?I will have to read through the posts since I have 15 more pages to see what has been happening, but I have to get my son breakfast and go somewhere so it might be later.
No I mean people being tormented forever, not being totally destroyed. I mean in Rev 20 where the devil will be tormented day and night forever, I just don't see how he will be tormented day and night forever but people will be totally destroyed.I believe in eternal punishment too.
So do you see these teachings as related to universalist teachings you have seen in the past...Olivia? Cause I have really been trying to figure out what is really at the root of this stuff?
Watch his video at about the 1 hour point...he cant answer that himself, but just kind of says "he don't like it, so it cant be true"...No I mean people being tormented forever, not being totally destroyed. I mean in Rev 20 where the devil will be tormented day and night forever, I just don't see how he will be tormented day and night forever but people will be totally destroyed.
No I mean people being tormented forever, not being totally destroyed. I mean in Rev 20 where the devil will be tormented day and night forever, I just don't see how he will be tormented day and night forever but people will be totally destroyed.
Watch his video at about the 1 hour point...he cant answer that himself, but just kind of says "he don't like it, so it cant be true"...
And any destroying of the wicked, I take to mean physically. How can eternal punishment mean someone being totally destroyed? God is not the author of confusion, He wouldn't use eternal punishment if people are going to be totally destroyed, He would use eternally destroyed. Wouldn't He?