1. Hello Guest! You are browsing the forums as a guest; you will have limited permissions as a guest so we advise registering to enjoy the forums fully. Remember: we are a Christian ONLY site - any user who is not Christian will not be approved. Blessings, Christian Forum Site Staff
    Dismiss Notice

EXAMPLES OF ETERNAL LIFE BEING LOST

Discussion in 'Bible Study' started by David Ward Jr, Jun 13, 2011.

  1. Examples of Eternal Life Being Lost

    In the Bible we not only have many passages plainly stating that eternal life can be lost and that the saved who sin will die and be damned, but we have many concrete cases of men and angels who once had eternal life and were in grace and favor with God, and who sinned and will be damned in Hell forever, regardless of their sonship and past union with God in grace.

    1. Lucifer, better known as Satan and the devil, and over one third of God's holy angels sinned and are to be dammed in a Hell especially prepared for them (Matt. 24:41). It would be folly for any one to argue that they were not once holy and sinless and in God's favor or grace. Angels are definitely called "sons of God" (Gen. 6:1-4; Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7). These sons of God in Job could not be men, for they were present when God laid the foundations of the Earth long before man was created (Job 38:4-7). If these "sons of God" fell and are to be damned then the childish argument of some that if a man is once a son he cannot be lost or else salvation is not salvation and eternal life is not eternal life, is proved to be a false theory. If God will damn some of creation who were in grace and who are called "sons," then He will also damn others if they sin, else God is unjust and a respecter of persons.

    Lucifer is spoken of as being "perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, TILL iniquity was found in thee" (Ezek. 28:11-17). He led an invasion into Heaven to dethrone God but was defeated and cast back to the Earth (Isa. 14:12-14; Luke 10:18). This rebellion of Lucifer and the Earth he ruled over, together with the angels of God who followed Lucifer, caused the judgment on the Earth before Adam (Gen. 1:2; Jer. 4:23-26, 2 Pet. 3:4-8). Although Rev. 12:3-9 refers to the future tribulation when Satan will be cast down to the Earth it does tell how many angels of God originally fell with Lucifer. (See Lesson Seven.)

    2. Demons—disembodied spirits who were one time in God's favor or grace, and as sinless in the beginning as all other creatures created by God. That they sinned and are doomed to eternal hell is clear by their own admission (Matt. 8:29; Luke 4:33-34; 8:31). Many are now in the abyss (Rev. 9).

    3. Abaddon—Apollyon—the king of the bottomless pit who leads the demon locusts of Rev. 9:1-11. Like the angels and demons mentioned above, he was once in grace or favor with God from which he fell, or he would not be confined to the abyss, and thus doomed.

    4. Demon-locusts—another kind of creatures, once sinless and perfect who fell from grace and favor with God and are now confined to the abyss in torment. Their bodies are
    described and their intelligence is referred to as being capable of tormenting certain men, and not others (Rev. 9:3-6).

    5. Demon-horsemen—intelligent creatures, 200,000,000 in number who will take orders and be led by four angels to slay one-third of men at a certain hour of a certain day (Rev. 9:12-21). They, too are now confined to the abyss in torment because of their sins which caused them to lose favor with God.

    6. Four angels—a special group, though perfect to begin with, now bound in the river Euphrates, being punished by God, for sin (Rev. 9:13-16). What particular sins were committed by all the creatures mentioned above, is not stated in each case; nevertheless, the cause of their fall from grace or favor with God is the same—sin, transgression of the law of God, rebellion, and refusal to obey Him and consecrate themselves to the best good of being and of the universe. See studies about spirit being in Lessons Four and Six.

    7. Pre-Adamites—the inhabitants of the earth before the days of Adam over whom Lucifer ruled until the earth was first hooded and all life existing upon it, was totally destroyed (Gen. 1:2, 27; Isa. 14:12-14; Jer. 4:23-26; Ezek. 28:11-17; Matt. 13:35; 2 Pet. 3:5-6; etc.). They are called "nations" (Isa. 14:1-14), "man" (Jer. 4:23-26); and they were subject to drowning which proves that they were mortal creatures the same as present man (2 Pet. 3:5-6). At one time they were in God's favor or grace, but being totally destroyed proves that they fell from His favor or grace which could only be through sin.

    8. Adam and Eve and the whole rare were once in God's favor or grace but they sinned and died because of sin (Gen. 2:17; 3:1-19; Rom. 5:12-21). Adam is called "the son of God" in Luke 3:38, so here is another concrete example of a "son of God" falling from grace and losing eternal life by sin. Those echo fell into sin in Adam must be born again to regain favor with God and live again. If they died once because of sin and can live again, then if they fall again they can then be brought back to life by the gospel. If it can happen once it can happen again and again if it becomes necessary, as proved in Lesson Twenty-three, Point IV, 14.

    9. The Antediluvians—human beings who lived between the time of Adam's creation and Noah's flood. "When they knew God, they glorified him not as God." They did not want to retain God in their knowledge, so they sinned, changing the glory of God into images; and God gave them up (Rom. 1:21-32). As stated in Rom. 1:32 they became "worthy of death." Paul told elect Israel ,in his day, that if they committed the same sins as the Antediluvians they too would receive like judgment of God (Rom. 2:1-5).

    10. The Postdiluvians—persons living in the time between Noah and Abraham, a period of 427 years. The Bible says that "Noah found grace in the eyes of the Lord" (Gen. 6:8); therefore the whole race (Noah and his household) was again in God's grace and favor. They had a new contract of righteousness with God (Gen. 9:1-18), but before the period came to an end had gone into idolatry and other sins, to such an extent that they had to be cut off (Gen. 11:1-9; Josh. 24:14-15).

    11. Abraham's descendants—many who went into sin during the 430 years of the period between Abraham and Moses. They lacked faith in God (Ex. 2:11-14; 14:1-9), and were in rebellion in the land of Egypt when God called Moses to lead them out. At the time of Moses they received the born again experience and were healed bodily until there was not a feeble person in all their tribes (Deut. 32:18-19; Ex. 15:26, 23:25; Ps. 105:37; 107:20). After that they went into idolatry and other sins at Sinai and in the wilderness, until God pronounced them "a stiffnecked people," who had "corrupted themselves;" and He wanted to "consume them" (Ex. 32:7-10). At this time He vowed, "Whosoever hath sinned against me, him will I blot out of my book " See Ex. 32:32-33.

    12. Aaron and all Israel as sinners regained God's favor and were blessed spiritually and physically (Ex. 29:43, 44; 31:13; Lev. 11:44, 45; 20:8, 15, 23; 22:9; Ex. 15:26; 33:12-17). Moses testified that they were begotten of God (Deut. 32:18). They had their names written in Heaven (Ex. 32:32, 33). When they sinned God said, "Whosoever hath sinned against me, HIM WILL I BLOT OUT OF MY BOOK" (Ex. 32:33). God would have destroyed them in a moment in their sin if it had not been for the intercession of Moses (Ex. 32:9-14; Deut. 9:20). He did later destroy the ones who afterwards did not believe (Jude 5).

    Israel is spoken of as having been "redeemed" by God (Ex. 15:13; Deut. 9:26; 15:15; 21:8; 2 Sam. 7:23; Psalm 71:23; 77:15; 106:10; 107:2; Isa. 29:22), as having had the gospel (Gal. 3:6-14; Heb. 4:2), and as having had every transgression they committed punished (Heb. 2:1-4; 1 Cor. 10:1-18). The whole redeemed nation were destroyed because of sin and unbelief; that is, the old generation (Jude 5; Heb. 4:11). See Lesson Eighteen, Point IX for the many spiritual blessings of Israel before they were cut off because of sin and unbelief. This proves they were in grace and were saved but were finally lost. If the many thousands were destroyed in plagues in the wilderness, as stated in 1 Cor. 10:1-18, then their souls were also lost.

    13. Nadab and Abihu, priests and holy men of God, were cut off because of sin (Lev. 10:1-20; Num. 3:4). The past favor or grace of God did not save them in the day of their sin. God soon proved to them that once in grace always in grace was not true when sin is committed.

    14. Korah, Dathan, Abiram, priests and holy men of God, as well as 250 princes and many common people in the redeemed nation of Israel, were in God's favor or grace, but were cut off in the day of rebellion (Num. 16).

    15. Saul, who was in God's favor or grace and who had the Holy Spirit, lost that favor and was destroyed because of sin (1 Chron. 10:13-14). He committed suicide and must be lost, for no murderer has eternal life (1 Sam. 28:7-25; 31:1-6; 1 John 3:15; Gal. 5:19-21). To argue that he was never a saved man is to demonstrate ignorance of Bible truth. "God gave him another heart . . . and the Spirit of God came upon him, and he prophesied" (1 Sam. 10:9-13). If this was not an experience of the saved man then it was nothing. It is also recorded how the Spirit of God left him when he sinned (1 Sam. 16:12-23). He went into spiritualism and God said He would cut off the man who did this (Lev. 19:31; 20:6; Deut. 18:11). He was a very humble and godly man to begin with, but he did not end this way (1 Sam. 10:21-24).

    No modern unconditional securityite could claim a better spiritual experience than Saul had, for they boldly testify they live in sin every day and at least Saul and every sinner could claim this much of a Christian experience. If Saul had the Holy Spirit he also had life, for all eternal life comes by the Spirit (John 6:63; Rom. 8:10-13; 2 Cor. 3:6; Gal. 6:7, 8; Rev. 11:11). If the Spirit left Saul, then he lost the eternal life he had by the Spirit. It is impossible to have the Spirit and not have eternal life, according to the above passages. Saul then had eternal life and lost it by sin.

    16. The nation of Israel—multitudes who failed in the 1700 year period between Moses and Christ, known as The Law. In this time Israel had many revivals and backslidings, many restorations to grace and many falls from grace, and those who died in sin and rebellion were lost, as individuals. See the following scriptures: Num. 11:1-9; 16:22-27, 46-50; 21:4-9, 23-34; 25:1-13; Deut. 30:1-10; 32:19-35; Josh. 7:1-26; Judg. 2:1-23; 3:5-7; 8:23-24; 10:6-16; 1 Sam. 2:35-36; 3:11-14; 1 Kings 9:3-9; 11:1-8, 30-39; 2 Kings 14:22-24; 17:1-20; 21:19-26; 2 Chron. 12:13-14; 14:1-11; 15:2-16; 17:1-6; 19:3-11; 20:13-34; 21:6-20; 23:1-21; 24:1-27; 25:1-28; 26:1-21; 27:2; 28:1-26; 33:1-25; 34:1-35:7; 36:1-23; Matt. 23:1-39; Luke 21:20-24; 1 Cor. 10:1-13; Rom. 11:11-22.

    17. Balaam—a true prophet of the Lord until he sinned and rebelled against the Lord, falling from His grace and favor. He schemed to get his reward and was killed by the sword of Israel (Num. 22:22-35; 23:4-5, 12, 16; 24:4, 16; 31:16; 2 Pet. 2:15; Jude 11; Rev. 2:14).

    18. Achan—a man in the days of Joshua whose sin was so great that God refused to bless the nation of Israel further until the sin was judged. If he had been a sinner before this God would have punished him before this; therefore we know that he was in God's grace until he broke the law, and was executed (Josh. 7:11-15, 22-26).


    Dake, Finis (2011). God's Plan for Man. Dake Publishing, Inc.. Kindle Edition.
     
  2. 19. Jeroboam—a man in God's grace who was promised the 10 tribes to reign over; and his house was to endure forever. All this was on the basis of: "if thou wilt hearken to all that I command thee, and wilt walk in my ways, and do that which is right in my sight . . . as David did" (1 Kings 11:30-39). Instead of doing this, Jeroboam made golden calves as gods and set up a rival worship to Jehovah. He went into the depths of sin, being afraid he would lose his kingdom over Israel (1 Kings 12:16-33). Because of his sin he fell from grace and favor, and God cursed him and cut off his whole family and kingdom (1 Kings 13:2-3;14:7-16; 15:30, 34;16:1-4,19, 26, 31; 21:22; 22:52; 2 Kings 3:3; 9:9; 10:29, 31; 13:2-13; 17:21-22; 23:15; 25:1-30; 2 Chron. 13:1-20). Jeroboam never did regain grace and favor with God.


    20. Amaziah—a king of Judah who turned to God and did that which was right for awhile. He thus regained grace and favor with God who blessed him (2 Chron. 25:1-12). After that he found new gods in Edom and fell from grace by worshipping them (2 Chron. 25:14-16). For this apostasy God cursed him and he died out of grace (2 Chron. 25:20-28).


    21. Many disciples of Jesus went back into sin and were lost for they followed Him "no more" (John 6:66). To argue that these people were not saved does not disprove the plain fact that they were "disciples" and had eternal life up to the time they went back (Heb. 10:26-39).
    If they went back, then they had something to go back from. They had something that caused them to follow Jesus in His persecutions. They were like the class in Luke 8:13 who "received the word with joy: and . . . for a while believe, and m time of temptation fall away." To believe in Christ for a moment brings eternal life and makes one a son of God (John 1:12; 1 John 5:1). Even these false security teachers make one act of faith all that a man must ever do to be saved eternally. So they, above all, should believe that these disciples that believed for a while had eternal life at one time. Jesus said the unprofitable servant would be cast into Hell (Matt. 24:45-51; 25:14-46; Rev. 3:14, 15). Of course, if we have to believe modern teachers we cannot believe all the Bible, so we have to make our own choice of whom to believe.
    22. The apostle Judas is an outstanding example of a man once saved who was lost because of sin. In Scripture we have statements that Judas was to be a man who was a "familiar friend" of Christ who ate of His bread, which is an idiom of close friendship (Ps. 41:9). He was not an enemy of Christ, but an equal in grace, a guide, and a sweet acquaintance (Ps. 55:12-13). He was to have his habitation desolate and be blotted out of the book of the living (Ps. 69:25-28 with Acts 1:20), and he was to have "another take his place" in the Christian ministry and in the kingship over one of the tribes of Israel (Ps. 109:8). These passages were fulfilled in Judas according to Matt. 26:24; John 13:18; Acts 1:16-25.


    In Matt. 10 we have the facts recorded that Judas as one of the "twelve disciples" received power over demons, sicknesses and diseases and a call to preach the gospel. Of these twelve (Judas included) it is said that Christ gave them power and sent them forth, and commanded them to preach, and to heal the sick. Christ said to Judas and all the twelve, "freely ye have received, freely give.... I send you forth as sheep . . . it shall not be ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father which speaketh in you" (Matt. 10:1-20).


    These statements prove that Judas was once chosen as a genuine apostle. He was then once a true believer, a saved man, one divinely empowered for service and equal in every sense to the others, a called preacher, a destroyer of Satan's works, an obedient man, a sheep, a man filled with the Spirit, and one who had God as his "Father."


    In Mark 6:7-13 we read that the twelve (Judas included) went "forth two by two . . . and preached that men should repent. And they (Judas included) cast out many devils, and anointed with oil many that were sick, and healed them."


    This proves that Judas was a divinely efficient man, a successful preacher and endued with power to heal. If he was not a saved man and if he could have all these experiences and do all these miracles as a sinner, then it would seem that the modern Christians who claim to be saved regardless of what they do should be able to do as much as Judas did whom they say was never saved. It is unreasonable and going too far to accuse Jesus of choosing an unsaved man to preach repentance and holiness, to heal the sick, to cast out devils, and to represent the Kingdom of God among men. Such men would rather hold on to this sinning-saint heresy than to cease accusing Jesus of such an unholy precedent whereby they make God's Word a lie. The only proof some men give to prove Judas was never saved is their own belief that Judas was not a saved man at one time because he was finally lost. They do not give one Scripture that proves that he was never saved, but they cite John 6:64-70 which passage does not say that Judas had at all times been a devil and unsaved. Jesus in this Scripture, was speaking of "some" of His disciples that believed not. "For Jesus knew from the beginning who they were that believed not, and who should betray him." The first part of this statement refers to the "some" that did not believe and does not include Judas, for after these had left Jesus, Judas was still with the twelve whom Jesus asked, "Will ye also go away?" Only the last part of this statement refers to Judas. Jesus not only knew who did not believe, but He also knew who would betray Him. He did not say that Judas did not believe or that he was a devil from the beginning and therefore was not a saved man.


    Judas did believe as proved in the facts above concerning his power and success in casting out devils and healing the sick. One cannot do these things unless he does believe. Even unconditional securityites cannot do these things after their one act of faith, which they contend is all that is necessary to be saved. Judas had to repent, believe, and be baptized in water to become a disciple and especially to be chosen as an apostle to do miracles.


    The Holy Spirit through Luke records that Judas "by transgression fell" (Acts 1:15-25) and if men would be as anxious to believe the Holy Spirit as they are to believe men, and if they would be as anxious to believe all Scriptures as they claim to believe some, they would show some consistency and honesty regarding the whole Word of God. Judas not only had a moral fall but sin caused it.


    Judas was not always a "devil" and a "thief." He became both after he had been saved for some time. His weakness was the love of money and this caused his fall (John 12:6; Luke 22:5; Matt. 26:14-16). If he had refused to be the treasurer of the first Christian disciples and had frankly told them that money was his weakness, he would have been better off. He had seen Christ escape the mob many times and he no doubt thought that the Lord would escape again and he himself would be $19.20 to the good.


    The Greek word diabolos translated devil in John 6:70 is also used of men. It literally means adversary. Any human or spirit-adversary of Christ is a devil. It is translated "false accusers" (2 Tim. 3:3; Tit. 2:3), "slanderers" (1 Tim. 3:11), and "devil" elsewhere. It teaches that Judas became an adversary, accuser, and slanderer of Christ. He was not a devil from the beginning as many teach. No such statement is found in the Bible of Judas, or anyone else. Even Satan was not a devil from the beginning. He was a sinless angel (Ezek. 28:11-17). It was not until the end of Christ's ministry that Judas began to pilfer and to grow cold in his love for Christ.


    It was not until the last supper that the devil entered into him, that is, became united with him in the same crime. It was two days before the Passover that he put it into the heart of Judas to go to the enemies of Jesus to betray Him into their hands (Matt. 26:1-5, 14-16; John 13:2). It was at this time that he openly broke with Christ and sought opportunity to betray Him.


    Judas was sorry afterwards for his betrayal (Matt. 27:3-5). He could have been forgiven as much as any of the others who cursed, denied Christ, and fled like cowards in the test. But being of a disposition to do so, he brooded over his fall and yielded to temptation to commit suicide.


    Judas then is a specific example of a New Testament man who was once saved and in God's favor or grace, but who lost this favor and went to Hell because of sin (Matt. 25:24; Acts 1:16-25). Jesus, Himself, acknowledged to the Father that of those whom the Father had given Him Judas was the only one whom He had lost (John 17:12). Christ could not have lost Judas if He had never had him to lose. Jesus further testified that to every one (including Judas) that the Father had given Him, He had given eternal life (John 17:2). Judas had this eternal life as much as the others but he became "lost" later and "by transgression fell" (Acts 1:25).


    23. Ananias and Sapphira were both killed by the power of God because of covetousness and lying to the Holy Ghost (Acts 5:1-14). That they were once saved is clear from Acts 4:32-5:1, for Ananias and his wife were classed with "the multitude of them that believed" and "were of one heart and one soul.... as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, and laid them down at the apostles' feet.... But a certain man [of those who believed and were of one heart and one soul] named Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession." If these two were believers and had been saved and were in the church, then it cannot be disputed with any degree of honesty that they were once saved and then lost. To deny they were once saved is to deny truth and it is not worth the price one has to pay.


    24. Many Galatians who were saved and had "received the Spirit," who had "begun in the Spirit," who were "redeemed and justified by faith," and who were "sons" of God by being made free from sin (Gal. 3:2-4; 3:13, 24; 4:4-7; 5:1-26), fell "from grace" and Christ became "of no effect" unto them (Gal. 5:4, 5). They were "removed from him" and "from grace," so once in grace, always in grace is not biblical unless one stays in grace (Gal. 1:6; 3:1-5; 5:1-9). They were plainly told that to go back under the law and into sins of the flesh, meant to "frustrate [cause to fail, nullify, make void] the grace of God" and that in such case they were not in grace and would reap corruption (Gal. 2:21; 5:1-9; 6:7, 8). They were told that if they built again the things of sin that were "once destroyed" they were transgressors and sinners (Gal. 2:17-18). They were taught that true eternal security was by walking in the Spirit and not fulfilling the works of the flesh (Gal. 5:16-26; 6:7, 8). Paul did not tell them that if they ever got in grace their responsibility as to sin was over. He accused them of falling from grace (Gal. 5:4), so such must be possible.


    25. Many other men who were formerly saved have gone back into sin and have been lost. This fact is clear from such statements as: "some having put away concerning the faith have MADE SHIPWRECK.... he hath DENIED THE FAITH. . . . when they begin to wax wanton against Christ, they will marry; HAVING DAMNATION, BECAUSE they have CAST OFF THEIR FIRST FAITH . . . and TURNED ASIDE AFTER SATAN . . . But they that will-be rich FALL INTO TEMPTATION AND A SNARE, and INTO MANY FOOLISH AND HURTFUL LUSTS, WHICH DROWN MEN IN DESTRUCTION AND PERDITION.... they HAVE ERRED FROM THE FAITH.... and OVERTHROWN the FAITH OF SOME.... If God will peradventure give them REPENTANCE.... that they may RECOVER THEMSELVES OUT OF THE SNARE OF THE DEVIL" (1 Tim. 1:19, 20; 5:8; 5:11-15, 20; 6:1, 10, 21; 2 Tim. 2:8-16).


    Each one of the statements above would disprove that doctrine of once in grace and faith always in grace and faith and once saved always saved, but here in 1 and 2 Timothy are many such statements in only two small books of the Bible. False security men go to any length in trying to explain away these simple passages because they so clearly contradict their theory. Some of them go so far as to deliberately mistranslate the Greek and quote self-made translations of men to prove that such simple statements do not mean what they say. For example, they mistranslate "they have cast off their first faith" to "they have broken their former promises" as if this proves a person cannot be lost. The Greek word pistin from pistis is never translated "promises" out of the hundreds of times it is used in the New Testament. It is translated faith 222 times and is referred to as the saving faith in Christ in Rom. 1:5, 16, 17; 3:25; 4:5-20; 5:1, 2; 10:17; Gal. 2:20; 3:24-29; Eph. 2:9; 4:5; etc. Thus the "faith" that they "made shipwreck" of, "denied," "cast off," "erred from," and did "overthrow" is the true saving faith and has no reference to some promise that the people made themselves.


    They could not CAST OFF, DENY, and MAKE SHIPWRECK OF this saving faith if they had not once had it. They could not get into the snare of the devil AGAIN unless they had once been delivered from him. They could not AGAIN be taken captive by the devil if they had always been his captives. They could not have "turned aside" AGAIN after Satan, if they had not been following Christ. They could not have ERRED FROM the faith through the hurtful lusts that "drowned in destruction and perdition" if they had not been once in the faith and free from such lusts. They could not have their faith OVERTHROWN if they had none to overthrow.


    Other translations of the Bible such as Moffatt, the Concordant Version, the Centenary Translation, Weymouth, etc., use stronger terms than does the King James Version, such as: "repudiated," "gone astray from," "failed," "thrusting away," "disowned," "strayed away from," "swerve from," "cast aside,' "led astray from," "overthrowing the faith," etc. If any of these things happen to one's saving faith he will no longer be saved, and he no longer will have the new life, which is only kept in him by faith (Gal. 2:20; Heb. 10:38-39; Gal. 3:11; Rom. 11:20).


    The unconditional securityites argue that the word "damnation" does not mean the loss of the soul, but means that one is condemned. The Greek word krima is translated "judgment to come" (Acts 24:25), "eternal judgment" (Heb. 6:2), and in many other places it is used of the future judgment of God, at which time men will be sent to Hell. It is translated "avenge" (Rev. 18:20), "condemnation" (1 Tim. 3:6; Jude 4), "damnation" (Matt. 23:14; Mark 12:40, Luke 20:47; Rom. 3:8; 13:2; 1 Tim. 5:12), and "to be condemned" (Luke 24:40). One can see by these Scriptures that it means the loss of the soul as in 1 Tim. 5:12. Changing the word damnation to condemnation does not change the final result, for all that are condemned will be sent to damnation and eternal Hell (John 3:17-19; Rom. 5:16-18; 8:1; Jude 4; 2 Pet. 2:6; Rev. 20:11-15; Matt. 25:41, 46).


    26. "Demas hath forsaken me, having loved this present world" (2 Tim. 4:10). He was a preacher according to Col. 4:14; Philemon 24. He could no longer be a child of God and have the love of God in him when he loved the world, for "if any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him," for God is love and He could not be in the life when love was not there (1 John 3:15; 4:8, 16).


    27. Many in the seven churches in Rev. 2-3 who were fallen frown grace were required to repent and do their first works or else be cart off in sin and be lost. Jesus was not a good once in grace man or an unconditional securityite according to His own words to these churches, for He kept rebuking, warning, and commanding Christians to meet certain conditions if they were to be saved, as we shall see in Point VII, 8 and 9 below.




    28. The church at Ephesus—a church that enjoyed God's favor and grace at one time or it could not have fallen as indicated when Christ said to it, "I have somewhat against thee, because thou hast left thy first love. Remember therefore from whence thou art fallen, and repent, and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent" (Rev. 2:4-5). One losing his first love loses God, as is clear from 1 John 4:7-8 which shows that if one does not have love he does not have God, for God is love. Any one who does not have God or love does not have grace. Having fallen from all of this the church at Ephesus was ordered to repent and do its first works, or have the candlestick removed, which means that the whole church would be removed, for the candlestick represents the church (Rev. 1:20). The church, completely destroyed for centuries, apparently did not do the first works again. As the case is, with any other backslider, the latter end is worse than the beginning (Luke 11:24-26; 2 Pet. 2:20-22). Christ demanded other churches to "repent" of idolatry, of committing fornication, and adultery (Rev. 2:14-15, 19-24; 3:19), and urged them to be on fire for God again, or be spued out of "my mouth" (Rev. 3:15-16). Thus we have many plain Scriptures stating that eternal life can be lost and many concrete examples of men who have lost eternal life through sin.






    Dake, Finis (2011). God's Plan for Man. Dake Publishing, Inc.. Kindle Edition.
     
  3. I didn't see any on your list who was saved and then lost their etenal salvation. Which begs the question, how is it called eternal, if its not?

    Quantrill
     
  4. Start with point #11 then, since you seem not to be familiar with the first 10. If you had read points 11 through 18 you would not have said what you just said....MAYBE! Who knows?
     
  5. I don't see anything that says they lost their eternal life. Do you? Where?

    Quantrill
     
  6. You obviously can't see because you are spiritually blind!
     
  7. You can't explaine it can you? Its not you material is it?

    Quantrill
     
  8. JUDGE NOT ACCORDING TO THE APPEARANCE; BUT JUDGE RIGHTEOUS JUDGEMENT!

    You do not know me at all, Sir! My knowledge of God's Word is up there. But you know what? Knowledge puffeth up, but love edifies! Love is something you are very much lacking, Sir! Just because I post something that was originally the work of someone else, that does not make me ignorant of that work! The work speaks for itself. It does not need explaining! You have a sick mind and heart, Sir!

    Also, I'm not one to take credit for something someone else did. I was honest enough to let you know who's the author of the work in the hopes you might get some of his material.

    I'm very familiar with the works of Finis Dake, for I have studied the Bible and his work since 1992. I was fortunate enough to be able to study the Dake's Annotated Reference Bible and God's Plan For Man from 1992 to 1996 for 8 to 16 hours a day EVERY DAY [no television at all during those 4 years]. Some nights I did not sleep. But why am I telling you this? You could care less. All you wish to do is cut someone down. You don't know me or my knowledge of the Bible. Yet you judge me unrighteously. Why should I take the time to explain something to you anyway? You could care less what I have to say. You have shown that already.
     
  9. Time to dial it back a notch or two, gentlemen. Let's keep the discussion germaine to the points raised and leave off the personal attacks.
     
  10. I agree whole heartedly!
     
  11. You should take the time to explain, because you have taken the time to display this list and others.

    Quantrill
     
  12. That is a judgement on your part and the same thing you accuse Quantrill of in Post #7.
     
  13. Administrator, is everyone walking around with a beam in their eye and unable to help their brother? I hope not! Otherwise, you could not have made your judgement you just made on me.

    EVERYBODY may have their own horrors from the past. However, everybody should not be living constantly in their past sins; habitually continuing in them. Everybody SHOULD be a NEW creature IN (harmony or union with) Christ. I'm saying this because all saints should judge all things, but do so RIGHTEOUSLY and not according to the appearance.

    1st Corinthians 2:15 "But he that is spiritual JUDGETH ALL THINGS yet he himself is judged of no man."

    The act of judging is to be a part of EVERY WAKING MOMENT. We should judge ourselves and others! We shall know them (Christians and/or professing Christians) by their fruits! We are to JUDGE (determine) if fruits be good or bad to JUDGE (determine) if one is a Christian or a mere professing Christian.

    1st Corinthians 5:11-12 "But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is CALLED a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such a one no not to eat. For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? Do not ye JUDGE them that are within?" One had to be JUDGED in order not to keep company with them.

    We are to test (judge) all spirits whether they be of God or not. For Satan himself could appear as an angel of light to deceive.

    Matthew 7:1-5 "Judge not, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, FIRST cast out the beam out of thine own eye; AND THEN shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye."

    AGAIN, I say, Does EVERYONE have a beam in their own eye and unable to SEE clearly to help a brother in need? According to the belief that everyone is sinning everyday in thought, word or deed; it seems no one can see clearly to help a brother in need. To the contrary, WE have the choice to cast out any beams out of our own eye [if any] that we may JUDGE to help a brother or sister in need.

    I wonder, are you sure you should be approaching me the way you are, Administrator?

    Administrator, do you believe everyone sins everyday in thought, word or deed?

    Respectfully,

    A brother in Christ
     
  14. I was not judging. Rather I made an observation.

    To quote you, talking to Quantrill:
    And you do not know him.

    We're all sinners. Ah, except you by your own admission.

     
  15. You have TOTALLY IGNORED what I mentioned about the subject of "JUDGING." You make no mention of it as if not to acknowledge it. Instead, you appear to have tried to dodge it by saying you have simply made an "OBSERVATION."

    Can I not make an OBSERVATION, as you call it?

    Are you saying Jesus is a liar when he told several people, "Go, SIN NO MORE, lest a worse thing happen unto thee?"

    Would Jesus tell someone to do something He knew they could not do?

    Would Jesus mislead someone?

    I think we KNOW the answer to those questions!

    HOW do you colocate your belief of everyone being sinners with the NUMEROUS scriptures that say a Christian SHOULD NOT SIN?

    WHY would God tell us to DO something or NOT DO something if we could not do it, as you say?

    The truth is, God sent His only son to die for sin and destroy sins power over us that we may live soberly, righteously and godly IN THIS PRESENT WORLD!

    No personal attacks in this thread! Unless, my refuting your comment is considered a personal attack. Seems tip toes around here.
     
  16. John 5:14 Afterward Jesus findeth him in the temple, and said unto him, Behold, thou art made whole: sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee.

    Whatever infirmity this man had was due to the judgement of God for a specific sin he had committed. Christs warning is for him not to continue in that sin or a worse thing would happen. He is not telling him to quit sinning period. Though, don't read that to mean Im saying its ok to sin. Im saying thats not what Christ is saying to this man. There is a difference.

    Quantrill
     
    Major likes this.
  17. It is really quite simple folks (admin excluded) ADDRESS THE POST AND NOT THE POSTER, and for heavens sake, stay out of the sand box! Act like the Christians you claim to be and quit wearing your feelings on your sleeves.


    This IHMO needs to be read slowly and thoroughly with great understanding >

    Forum Etiquette!

    The Internet has become a world-wide community and in the process, innumerable forums on every subject under the sun are available where people can express their opinions. Some forums are closely moderated -- that is, someone checks every post for suitability before it is uploaded to the forum. Some forums have minimal or no moderation, only Terms of Service (TOS) that members are expected to follow. Most forums do have some sort of reporting feature for obscene or harassing posts. Still, even with a minimally-moderated forum, is there a standard of behavior? Is there actually something called forum etiquette? The answer is an unqualified yes.

    Forum etiquette means maintaining a standard of posting behavior that is acceptable and appropriate. Forum etiquette can be flexible, according to the subject of the forum, but there are certain standards most people expect others to maintain. Some lines must be drawn for the safety of all posting on the forum.

    One of the staunchest rules of forum etiquette is not posting personal information about another poster. Even if that poster has all but drawn a map to his house, posting a real name or address is considered grounds for a permanent ISP ban on most forums. This could compromise someone's safety. This is probably the most serious breach of forum etiquette and most moderators take it very seriously.

    You can disagree with someone's opinions, but calling that person an idiot or a profane name is a violation of forum etiquette. Some forums are more liberal about this than others, but keeping it civil is never the wrong thing to do. Posting the same thing over and over again is called scrolling, and is also a banning offense. It is annoying in the extreme and uses up bandwidth, which someone is paying for. It is entirely unnecessary and makes the poster look immature and childish.

    Trolls are always in flagrant violation of forum etiquette and enjoy disturbing the peace at any forum where they post. Trolls tend to scroll, call names, gossip about other posters, post things that are deliberately provocative and usually that violate the forum's rules about posting. Most moderators hasten to get them banned as soon as possible, but they can sometimes do a lot of damage before this happens.

    Another violation of forum etiquette is posting in ALL CAPS. This is considered shouting and is very rude, in addition to being hard on the eyes. Something may be in caps for emphasis (e.g. I did NOT want to go!), but no post should be entirely in all caps.

    Flaming, or deliberate insults or personal rants, is also against forum etiquette. Flaming is often employed by people who are losing arguments on a forum. Their response is to personally insult the poster disagreeing with them, usually in a long, nasty post.

    This kind of behavior is why so many forums have a list of posting rules and consequences for breaking them. Some may say this behavior is more prominent among immature teens, but that is in no way the case. Many of the worst offenders are adults who should know better. The veil of anonymity seems to bring out the worst in these people, and any bullying tendencies they have tend to become magnified in the semi-protection of an anonymous forum.

    Most of the rest of forum etiquette involves using the Golden Rule: treat others as you would like to be treated. Behaving as a reasonable adult, even in the face of being flamed, is always the best course of action. If a poster becomes harassing, obscene or personal, do not retaliate. Instead, cut and paste the offensive post(s) into an e-mail and quickly report it to the moderator or forum administrator.
    http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-forum-etiquette.htm

    My apologies to the staff for overstepping my boundaries. Now back to the regular scheduled fellowship!
     
    Major likes this.
  18. then they never were saved?
     
  19. David,

    The administers job is to monitor and control forum threads. While, as near as I can tell from the 3 threads all about the same thing, you were insulted first, by responding to uncharitable comments, you only make the situation worse.

    In the future you should simply "report" such posts and as ForgivenWretch suggested, respond only to comments that are on topic.

    Also, I suggest you not argue with moderators publicly. Instead, send them a private message if you feel their judgment was in error.

    I apologize for writing this in the thread, but I couldn't find an option to speak with you privately.

    Ginger
     
  20. I disagree. The one you refer to as "Lucifer" was in God's presence while sinning, so your statement above does not support your argument.

    Job 1:6 One day, when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, Satan also came among them.
    7 And the LORD said to Satan, "Whence do you come?" Then Satan answered the LORD and said, "From roaming the earth and patrolling it."
    8 And the LORD said to Satan, "Have you noticed my servant Job, and that there is no one on earth like him, blameless and upright, fearing God and avoiding evil?"
    9 But Satan answered the LORD and said, "Is it for nothing that Job is God-fearing?
    10 Have you not surrounded him and his family and all that he has with your protection? You have blessed the work of his hands, and his livestock are spread over the land.
    11 But now put forth your hand and touch anything that he has, and surely he will blaspheme you to your face."

    Moses sinned by disobeying God and was not allowed to enter the promised land, but later in the New Testament three Apostles witnessed Jesus in heaven with Moses and Elijah.

    Deut 34:4 The LORD then said to [Moses], "This is the land which I swore to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob that I would give to their descendants. I have let you feast your eyes upon it, but you shall not cross over."
    5 So there, in the land of Moab, Moses, the servant of the LORD, died as the LORD had said;
    

    Compare to:

    
    Luke 9:28 About eight days after he said this, he took Peter, John, and James and went up the mountain to pray.
    29 While he was praying his face changed in appearance and his clothing became dazzling white.
    30 And behold, two men were conversing with him, Moses and Elijah,
    31 who appeared in glory and spoke of his exodus that he was going to accomplish in Jerusalem.
     

Share This Page