I just put the chapters in because switching to "mysword" on tablet back and forth is rough. PC's and E-Sword are quick and far more efficient.
All I am saying Major is we have scriptures that do not fit the OSAS mold. Why I said that I try to stay away from Doctrines of men, and lots of these Doctrines attempt to fit all scripture into the doctrine making them all absolutes.
Remember the thread about the Sabbath? All scriptures seem to point to keeping the Sabbath despite what the scripture said.
1) We judge ourslves or God Judges us that we be not condemned with the World. The World is on their way to Hell.
This verse would suggest that refusing to be corrected, ends badly.
2) Paul turned one over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh that his "spirit" may be saved.
What happens if the man does not change (He did repent and was full of sorrow praise God) but was he in danger of hell?
3) Jesus said, Rev 3:5 kjva He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.
What happens if you don't overcome? Some have made up a "lambs book of life and a seperate book of life to explain this away.
4) Heb 6:4-8 kjva 4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers of the Holy Ghost, 5 And have tasted the good word of God, and the powers of the world to come, 6 If they shall fall away, to renew them again unto repentance; seeing they crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put him to an open shame. 7 For the earth which drinketh in the rain that cometh oft upon it, and bringeth forth herbs meet for them by whom it is dressed, receiveth blessing from God: 8 But that which beareth thorns and briers is rejected, and is nigh unto cursing; whose end is to be burned.
We could use what Paul said that if anyone works abide not (man produced thorns instead of fruit) the man will suffer loss but still saved as by fire.
We have to keep all scriptures in mind.......... He is Neigh unto cursing....... that means close to it.
We can do nothing to bring the person back, though we can't, it does not say he can't repent and start producing good fruit.
5) Heb 10:26-29 kjva 26 For if we sin wilfully after that we have received the knowledge of the truth, there remaineth no more sacrifice for sins,
ONE SIN, because the ONE SIN is mentioned below.
27 But a certain fearful looking for of judgment and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adversaries. 28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: 29 Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
The sin was counting the blood covenant a unholy thing and not worthy enough to save. Going back to other gods
6) John wars there is a sin unto death........ All unrighteousness is sin, but there is ONE sin unto death........... Stay away from idols. Same sin someone could commit in Hebrews 10.
So instead of believing some blanket OSAS doctrine of man. We need to understand there are scriptures that point to the fact man is still responsible to do what they are told and not leave Jesus for some other god, like Allah.
We are to judge ourselves.
We are to trust in God and overcome.
We are to stick with God, being thankful for our Salvation (born again)
We need to be aware that continuing in sin, may end badly. As Paul turned one over to Satan to save the man's spirit.
I know you will not agree with what I am going to say but here it is anyway.............
I do not believe that there are any Bible verses at all which speak to or teach that a truly born again person can lose his salvation!!!!!
All the Scriptures which are used by those who reject OSAS are used out of context. Lets consider the passage you used from Hebrews 6:4-6 shall we???
There are many people who teach today that this passage clearly shows that a Christian can lose their salvation. And in a cursory reading, it does seem that this interpretation is correct. Now, here is the key to that......IF we approach that passage with the agenda already in our minds to reject OSAS, then we will read into that Scripture what we want to believe without digging any deeper to be rightly dividing the Word of God.
It is the same with all the other verses if we would consider them and we must be aware of the danger of "the first glance.”
So let’s dig in here and see what we can determine from those Scriptures you quoted.
Hebrews 6:4-6 (NKJV):............
4 For it is impossible for those who were once enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit,
5 and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come,
6 if they fall away, to renew them again to repentance, since they crucify again for themselves the Son of God, and put Him to an open shame.
This passage begs the question, “How can one be ‘enlightened’ and fall away?” "AT FIRST GLACE" It does seem to be speaking of someone losing his salvation.
But when we dig in we must identify who is the “they,” and from what have they “fallen away”?
I an sure that we all know know that this section of Hebrews is about apostates/heretics and Jews -- those who may have, to some degree, embraced the truth, but have now abandoned it. It’s also important to know how the believers who originally read this message of
“those who were once enlightened” would understand it. Today, we might think it means that they were enlightened about the truth, or that they were regenerated. But what was the intent of the original author, and how would his readers have understood it?
Enlightened does not always mean "Regenerated/Saved".
For correct context, in this verse, it is speaking of people who were involved, perhaps heavily involved, in a church. It is likely they would have joined a congregation, heard the Gospel, and saw the Spirit working in the life of Believers. They doing what they saw real believers doing but they never had a saving knowledge of Christ.
Another key word in understanding who is being described here is the word
“tasted.” That word alone should be a clue for us to understand.
They only “tasted” or “sampled” Christ. They were never truly converted to faith in Him. That would be like comparing several dates with someone as being married to them. Two very different contexts because there is a lake of commitment in dating someone as opposed to being married to them.
This is seen in the not uncommon situation people who have been in a church for many years, been involved in many things, never missed a service, yet are not saved. IT would also speak to the actions of the person you spoke of who was involved in the Billy Graham program. They’ve been “enlightened” by seeing God at work, but only just “tasted” what was going on, never really being a part of it. They most likely would have even partaken of the Lord’s Supper, as the wording in the passage suggests. But they were never really saved. To sort of paraphrase Scripture, they were “in the church, but not of the Church.”
Listen folks....being a member of a church only does one thing. It gives you the right to vote at business meetings!!!
So to be a member of a church, and be “enlightened” by the life of the Church and seeing God at work, doesn’t guarantee salvation. Neither does being baptized, for that matter. “Enlightened” does not necessarily mean “saved.”
Without a doubt we need doctrine for salvation (we can’t have faith in just anything, can we?), we aren’t saved by a doctrinal understanding or doctrinal authority
.
Now the question is, “If the ‘they’ is someone who has ‘tasted’ of the Church, has seen what has been going on and seen God at work, has been ‘in the church, but not of the Church,’ what exactly have they ‘fallen away’ from that they can’t be 'renew[ed] again to repentance’? And doesn’t that imply that they were originally brought to repentance?
As for “crucify again the Son of God” and putting Him to an open shame, this is similar to the warning given in Hebrews 10:26-29 :.........
26" For if we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,
27 but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries.
28 Anyone who has rejected Moses’ law dies without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses.
29 Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace?"
If someone leaves the Church because they don’t feel that Jesus is the Christ or that He is the only Way, it is as if they “trample the Son of God underfoot,” and count Christ’s sacrifice a “common thing.” What those who fall away have done, after having received the knowledge of the truth (being “enlightened”) and have gone beyond the point of repentance by rejecting God’s Son, is they have joined the ranks of those who rejected Him and sentenced Him to death; in effect, “they crucify again for themselves the Son of God.” They would, if they were there, have joined the crowd who chanted, “Give us Barabbas!” “Give me something else!” is what the person is saying in abandoning Christ.
Even the leaders in Jesus’ day knew He was from God, but declared Him otherwise when they strived to put Him on the Cross. Those who fall away after experiencing the truth of Christ join the religious leaders of Christ’s day, in their crucifying again for themselves the Son of God.
Yet, as Hebrews 10:29 says, the punishment will be much worse for those who abandon their confession.