Folks, this is powerful stuff from some famous atheists who, on the brink of death, realized the error of their beliefs and the lack thereof.
What's interesting is that our atheist friends who are not yet on that precipice, and therefore able to see glimpses into eternity as did those who have passed, they will claim that those people were simply experiencing an emotional reaction to the knowledge of their eminent death.
To those who are yet healthy and thinking that they can negate the testimony of their predecessors who have, are or are about to pass from this life, I would ask them how they think that they know what they have not yet ever seen nor experienced. They claim the nonexistence of God, having never seen Him, and so they are now going to compound their folly by trying to negate the experiential testimonies of some of the most famous atheists? Somehow they are qualified to stand as judge and jury over what they have never witnessed, have never beheld with their own eyes?
Do you see how self-defeating their argument is, in how they will inevitably vomit their doubts of even those things experienced and seen by their fellow atheists, simply because they testified of what the healthy atheist simply doesn't WANT to believe?
This is one reason I agree with R. C. Sproul and many others who have said, "I have never met an intellectual atheist!"
This video is well worth your time to watch/listen.
What's interesting is that our atheist friends who are not yet on that precipice, and therefore able to see glimpses into eternity as did those who have passed, they will claim that those people were simply experiencing an emotional reaction to the knowledge of their eminent death.
To those who are yet healthy and thinking that they can negate the testimony of their predecessors who have, are or are about to pass from this life, I would ask them how they think that they know what they have not yet ever seen nor experienced. They claim the nonexistence of God, having never seen Him, and so they are now going to compound their folly by trying to negate the experiential testimonies of some of the most famous atheists? Somehow they are qualified to stand as judge and jury over what they have never witnessed, have never beheld with their own eyes?
Do you see how self-defeating their argument is, in how they will inevitably vomit their doubts of even those things experienced and seen by their fellow atheists, simply because they testified of what the healthy atheist simply doesn't WANT to believe?
This is one reason I agree with R. C. Sproul and many others who have said, "I have never met an intellectual atheist!"
This video is well worth your time to watch/listen.