smellycat

do we have pictures ?has anybody opened it?

Watchman

This video is convincing, but for some reason I was always under the impression that the Ark of the Covenant was in Ethiopia....

I wonder why these findings of Ron's have never been greatly publicized. This is quite possibly the most significant thing ive ever heard and seen.

__________________
Habakkuk 3:2LORD, I have heard of your fame;
I stand in awe of your deeds, O LORD.
Renew them in our day,
in our time make them known;
in wrath remember mercy

carolinasteve

If the Ark has been discovered, it is significant in the fact that it is absolute proof that yes the story is true, and the flood did occur, which adds further inarguable validity to the Bible. Do you really think that the non believing world wants that to be publicized? The evidence for it being a very old boat matching the Biblical description of the size, make up, location and age are, to me very convincing, but it still could be a very old boat on a mountain range built by someone who read or at least knew the details of the story.Improbable, but not entirely impossible.The ones that argue that it is just a natural formation, or random occurance, are blind are blind to design as one would expect any atheist to be, which explains alot. But the bottom line is, we can only suppose what it actually is.

So, while yes,if it is Noah's Ark, then it is a death blow to those who say the flood never happened and the story is just another "myth" of Biblical proportions. Since there is no conclusive,rock hard evidence, it got it's fair share of publicity when the story first broke, and it has continued to be analized and examined in obscurity, until a new discovery is made that substantiates one side or the other.The same is true for any other discoveries regarding biblcal veracity. Any one ever heard of the Tel Zayit stone?
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/09/in...erland&emc=rss
(wow,that link came out long. Wish I knew how to do one word links)

Whirlwind

I'm sorry, but I'm highly suspicious (blood story).

He talks like a man who doesn't know very much about the science(s)--"they did whatever tests they need to do to determine that"--and then he turns around and says that they can't take a chromosome count from dried blood. Dried blood is dead blood. Ummm...no, it isn't.

Where'd he get this blood? If there was a drop of Christ's blood left anywhere on the earth, wouldn't it have been snatched away during the cruisades? Wouldn't religions be battling over it today?

What if the wrong people got a hold of this blood? What if the wrong man tried to produce a clone from this sample? What if Hitler had cultured this blood in labs and had injected himself with the result?

I believe in the blood, yes, amen! But the blood of Christ that I believe in is inside of me...washing my sins away.

Boanerges

I believe every word in the bible is fact but I too am sceptical about Mr. Wyatt until I see concrete evidence.

LivingWaters

I have never heard of this man until I saw this thread. I think it is interesting stuff and want to see what he claims to have discovered. Thanks for bringing this up!