smellycat

if he wasn,t sanctioned by God then his books are at 1 side likethe other 7.

da_man

Still inspired by God. Not written on his own.

smellycat

diffrent it is said you bring old truth with new truth.give me luke new truth?so it is nonsense like the other 7.

da_man

Huh??

smellycat

every prophet gives old truth with new truth.if luke does not this then he is not a prophet.

da_man

Did Luke ever claim to be a prophet?

smellycat

then why do you read him in the bible and not mohammed.

da_man

Cause Luke was allowed in the Bible. I don't feel it is my place to question God.

smellycat

that is nothing to do with it,or add the lost 7 books.do things in truth.the 7 books might be hear,say too so why is luke in the bible.

da_man

I think it is because they must have found something in those other seven books that they could not verify. All of the books that were allowed in the cannon were verifiable and true.
Those other 7 books may have some very good information in them but there was something there that was unverifiable. Whether Luke was a prophet or not has no bearing if his writings were inspired. If we were to question this then why don't we question the whole Bible. The book of Matthew was written around 60 A.D. How do we know what Matthew wrote about Jesus is actually true. It was written about 30 years after Jesus' death. Try to remember accurately something that happened in your life 30 years ago.